Nozick s Theory Of Equality And Equality - 2501 Words

When talking about Rawls, Nozick, and Walzer, three political philosophers in their own right, each has a theory regarding one s freedoms and equality. In each one s assumptions they conclude differently as to what a just or fair government should look like. Rawls theory when discussing freedom and equality falls into two principles of justice, of which follow the â€Å"veil of ignorance† which is to say that everyone is unknown to their unique differences like ethnicity, sex, personal convictions and the like. Everything, according to Rawls, should be equal for everyone in an ideal society. With Nozick, his response mainly bounces off Rawls claim of equality and comes to his own line of principles as well. Nozick s assumptions are that inequalities are fine so as much that rights are not being violated. Nozick wants inequalities because those are what makes a balance in society, also people are entitled to things that fall into three principles. Walzer points to spheres of justice in his assumptions, in which each sphere, being economical, political, social, educational and so forth, has their own space and the people should look to keep them from intervening with each other. Walzer uses dominance to show what can occur should one sphere connect with another, where one person with high standings in, say, an educational sphere shouldn t have, albeit it sometimes happens, a beneficial effect in the political sphere. Walzer also comes up with some three principles that, asShow MoreRelatedJustice Means Equality For Equals And Inequality For Unequal s Equality1593 Words   |  7 PagesC.S Lewis once said â€Å"justice means equality for equals and inequality for unequal’s† . To interpret this quote we must first define what justice really means. Justice means giving each person what he or she deserves. The quote by C.S Lewis states that even though rules and regulation are made for all individuals, in one way or another difference are still made between societies and no one is known about it. In other word, those who are always treated equal, will continue to be treated equally andRead MoreNozick s Version Of Libertarianism1481 Words   |  6 PagesNozick s version of libertarianism says that what is controlled in society should be limited to what are the essentials to keep society together. A majority of the services and basics that people require to live can be provided by the private sector and not by the state that lead to unjust in the distribution of goods and services. The services that should be left to the government according to Nozick’s belief are those of security such as the police and military and the enforcement of common lawsRead MoreRawls Primary Principles Of Justice1321 Words   |  6 Pagesjustice is what rights and duties members of society have in the prevailing institutions and how the benefits should be distributed. With this, Rawls argues from two primary principles of justice. The f irst being the equality principle and the second being the difference principle. The equality principle stipulates that each individual must hold the same level of liberty as each other individual. The difference principle advocates that social and economic inequalities be distributed only to the advantageRead MorePolitical And Economic Theory Is An Often Contentious Subject1582 Words   |  7 PagesPolitical and economic theory is an often contentious subject as it relates to how much interference governments should be allowed when it comes to rights and welfare of the public. One of the most debated topics asks the question â€Å"is it a part of the government s role to take wealth away from the rich to give to the poor?† John Rawls and Robert Nozick offer two differing theories about the role of government in distributing wealth. John Rawls argues that a just society must have equal rights forRead MoreJohn Rawls And Robert Nozick Vs. Nozick1948 Words   |  8 Pagesphilosophers, John Rawls and Robert Nozick, and compare and contrast their beliefs on what that question means and whether or not one theory is more beneficial to society in the long run. Throughout history there has always been a dilemma between freedom and equality. Some people think they are one in the same but there are differences. Freedom is the ability of individuals to be their own person and make choices that are based on their own individuality. Equality is the ability to exercise rightsRead MoreThe s Vs. Nozick s Theory On Justice2035 Words   |  9 Pages342 Rawl’s vs Nozick’s Theory on Justice: Comparing and Contrasting What does justice mean and what role should the government play in maintaining it? Does it mean to redistribute wealth to help those who are less fortunate or does it mean allowing individuals to freely give to those who are poor? This question has been debated for a long time and will still be debated for years to come. This paper will look at the writings of two philosophers, John Rawls and Robert Nozick, and compare and contrastRead MoreThe Principles Of Distributive Justice2244 Words   |  9 Pagesof goods, what can be distributed, and how do different criteria of distribution apply variably to different kinds of goods. Distributive justice is a critical concept in the theory of justice and many thinkers have formulated their own concept around it. The thinkers that I will analyze and discuss their views and theories are Plato, Rawls, Walzer, JS Mills, and Bentham. The criteria that I believe that morally justifies a distribution of goods are merit and need. In my view a just world will allowRead MoreNozick and Rawls3588 Words   |  15 PagesNozick’s entitlement theory or Rawls theory of distributive justice? The defence of liberal ideologies emerged not long after the Second World War, prior to this there had been little faith in liberal values during the 1920’s and 1930’s, however after the war there appeared to be a renewed defence for liberal thinking ranging across a variety of ideological theories. To the present day these liberal perspectives continue to influence political thinking with regards to rights, equality and freedom. ThisRead MoreThe Role of Justice in Society2403 Words   |  10 Pagessituations. While egalitarians evaluate justice based on equality, utilitarians are only interested in justice as a means to an end. Smart advocates the principle of utility, which defines the morally action as whatever produces the greatest net happiness for everyone affected by that act. To identify an act as ‘just, Rawls employs the theory of justice as fairness. This theory stresses the principle of equal rights, and that an act is ‘just if equality is realized by everyone affected by the act. BeforeRead MoreA Theory Of Justice By Rawls1317 Words   |  6 PagesIn his book ‘A Theory of Justice’, Rawls was dissatisfied with the traditional philosophical arguments about what makes a social institution just and about what justifies political or social actions and policies. The utilitarian argument holds that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has a number of problems, including, especially, that it seems to be consistent with the idea of the tyranny of majorities over minorities. The intuitionist argument holds